Arrive To vs. Arrive At

Arrive To vs. Arrive At Arrive To vs. Arrive At Arrive To vs. Arrive At By Maeve Maddox A prepositional error usually associated with ESL learners seems to be gaining ground with native English speakers. It’s the error of following the verb arrive with the preposition to: The 23-year-old actress arrived to her taping of  The Tonight Show sporting a long blonde beard to match her hair.   When many early Europeans first  arrived to  our shores,  they  were surprised at the lack of organized law enforcement. As soon we arrived to the restaurant she made  sure she was secretive about my daughters [sic] Bday surprise!!! Ipanema Flip Flops have  arrived to  Tony Walker Co. To is a preposition of movement. One travels to a restaurant, but arrives at a restaurant. Prepositions that can follow arrive include at, in, and on. Use at to express arrival at a small place: The 23-year-old actress arrived at her taping of The Tonight Show. As soon as we arrived at the restaurant, they brought out the cake. Use in to express arrival when the destination is a large one like a country or a city: We arrived in France in November. When did you first arrive in Milwaukee? The sentence that has the Europeans arriving â€Å"to our shores† can be rewritten with on: When many early Europeans first  arrived on our shores,  they  were surprised at the lack of organized law enforcement. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:10 Grammar Mistakes You Should AvoidDoes "Mr" Take a Period?Uses of the Past Participle