Paralleled Ideals between Fredrickson and Jefferson...

Social Contract is a theory that has been studied by many in an attempt to decide if it is modifiable or unchanging. In Thomas Jefferson’s letters to Virginia, he reveals his feelings on the issues of slavery and the assimilation of Negros into the colonial population. Some of these ideas and beliefs paralleled in concepts when compared to the theories coined by Fredrickson: Group Separatism, Ethnic Hierarchy, Cultural Pluralism, and One Way Assimilation. When analyzing Fredrickson’s theories it is easy to identify similarities within the studied beliefs of Jefferson addressed in his letters to Virginia manuscript, but also you are able to identify differences as well. In his manuscript, Jefferson philosophies point towards an ethnocentric viewpoint when he talks about the needs and elitism of the colonial whites. He says that in order to maintain a purer society of whites the negro slaves must be removed, â€Å"This unfortunate difference of color, and perhaps of faculty, is a powerful obstacle to the emancipation of these people [†¦] while they wish to vindicate their liberty of human nature, are anxious also to preserve its dignity and beauty† (Jefferson 105). He hoped that by making policy around the removal and extradition of the slaves, the moral fabric of the colonies would remain pure and unaffected by the interaction or presence of Negro slaves in their population. This ideal most identifies with the Ethnic Hierarchy theory Fredrickson is responsible for. FredricksonShow MoreRelatedOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesof the world’s human population for the first time in history. He gives considerable attention to changes in city planning, patterns of urban growth, and important differences between industrialized Europe and North America and the developing world, as well as the contrasts in urban design and living conditions between different sorts of political regimes— communist, capitalist, colonial, and fascist. Particularly revealing are Spodek’s discussions of the influence of prominent urban planners